The Psycho-dynamics of Advocacy and Judging (LAW463H1S)

This course introduces the use of rhetorical techniques in advocacy, bearing in mind the core orientations of judges, advances in cognitive science and psychology, the use of narrative, the margins of manoeuvre open to judges in our legal system, and the constraints imposed by the rule of law and by the modes of judicial responsibility.

Advances in cognitive science and psychology have led more sophisticated persuasive techniques. In response, the task of judges is to detect the use of these rhetorical techniques and avoid being lured away from doing justice according to law.

To these is added the filter of ethics – judicial and lawyerly. How do judges and lawyers meet their obligations, in the course of a lawsuit, to first, do no harm; then, do the right thing, for the right reason, in the right way, at the right time, and in the right words, while resisting the lure of cognitive biases and personal prejudices? Do rule of law constraints work to ensure principled advocacy and adjudication?

By the end of the course, students will be familiar with and competent in identifying the use of the rhetorical techniques in decided cases, and in developing strategies for their use in advocacy within the constraints imposed by a good understanding of the judicial function and the rule of law.